Saturday, July 9, 2022

1800 Mile Cruise with a 1933 Elto Super C - 1934

I have added some extra photos, often vintage postcards, to this article as I like to see the places the author mentions. The original photos have the caption on the photo..



Old Ironsides Sees Chicago and the Fair
E. C. Cameron                                                                       
       
MY friends tell me I am one of the few fortunate individuals whose business deals with his hobby and whose hobby deals with his business; in short, I'm a marine contractor. 
So when the day’s work is done, I crank up my Elto and go out for an hour's ride—right out in the Atlantic Ocean.  And when the year’s work is done, and vacation time approaches, I plan a nice long boat ride, or cruise, if you'd rather be dignified.

Hitherto, I've always contented myself with a cruise reasonably close to up the Hudson to Albany, again down to Hatteras, or up to Martha’s Vineyard.  But this year I wanted to see the World's Fair in Chicago and I wanted to cruise.  So I decided to make it a whale of a vacation by driving my Elto-powered Old Ironsides to Chicago.


My business is at its quietest from about August first to the middle of September. Also wind and weather on our interior waterways are probably as favorable at this time as any. Accordingly, I planned to start for Chicago about August first.

I was a little puzzled as to the route to take. Naturally, the long route southward around Florida and up the Mississippi-Illinois waterway was out on account of the time element; also because of the approach of the hurricane season.

Two other routes were feasible. Both followed the Atlantic Coast, Hudson River, Erie Canal as far as Three River Point in New York. One route then follows the Canal west to Lake Erie at Buffalo—then Lake Erie to the Detroit River, Lake Huron, and down Lake Michigan to Chicago.  The second and chosen route follows the barge canal north to Oswego, across Lake Ontario to Trenton, via Trent Waterways to Midland, Georgian Bay, North Channel and Lake Michigan.

The latter route was chosen, first because I felt it would take me through far more beautiful country which would in turn make my trip the more enjoyable; secondly, because it offered the shorter and more protected route for my small craft.  Now that it’s over, I know I made no mistake, for every foot of the way offered new and magnificent views that I'm sure could not be found on any other route.

Now as to equipment, there was little of it.  I have found that the tendency is always to over-equip, and of the two, I really believe the water traveler can make faster time under-equipped than he can if he has to wrangle a deck load of knickknacks that he thinks he may
have use for.

The boat, and right here you folks who are convinced that a step-plane is frail and unseaworthy, had better prepare for a shock, in a step-plane.  It is 18 feet long with a 55-inch beam.  It was built to follow exactly the plans of the famous Hacker Pelican, the design so extremely popular in the 151 racing class a few years back.  The top sides were altered to provide for a forward deck 6 feet long, a low cabin 6 feet long amidships, and an open 6-foot cockpit aft.

The motor was a hand-starting 1933 Elto Super C, which developed 21.2 N.O.A. certified B.H.P.   I have used this model for three years for my own cruising as I have found it to contain just the right balance of power, speed, and ruggedness for all around work.  In the 1800 miles which I travelled on this cruise the only motor replacements made were shear pins.  When I arrived at Milwaukee on the way to Chicago, I had the motor checked at the factory and found that not a single part needed replacing.


Before going in the water, without equipment the boat weighed 520 pounds.  Total weight
including all equipment, spare gas, myself (I weigh 200 pounds), and motor, was 1100 pounds.  Completely loaded, it had a cruising speed of 25 m.p.h., a top speed of 28 m.p.h. The same outfit minus only miscellaneous equipment, which ran about 300 pounds, made a certified American Power Boat Association record of 33 miles per hour with a strictly stock Elto Super C. 

I used no steering wheel, but steered entirely by hand. I prefer this for two reasons: First, hand-steering permits positive, instant control of the boat to a much greater degree than that allowed by a steering wheel; second, an outboard is an outboard, so why hamper it with inboard trimmings such as a steering wheel, remote control and auxiliary fuel system? 
Then, too, freedom from steering cables, etc. made it easy to bring the motor inboard when I wanted to change a shear pin.  I've lost too many wrenches overboard when leaning out trying to replace a shear pin at long range.

I used no auxiliary fuel pumping system as this would mean extra weight and would take up valuable space.  I much prefer to run out a motor tankfull, stop and refill out of a 5-gallon can.  This afforded a regular opportunity to stretch, relax,  
and take bearings. Then too, refilling this way even in rough water wasn't hard, as my boat rode even a good chop very nicely.

I also carried a good barometer, two magnetic compasses, one costing 35 cents, the other
75 cents, a chart roll, five 5-gallon gas cans, a couple of tins of corn willy and ships biscuits,
a couple of cans of beans, tea, a can of Sterno, a gallon water canteen, a paddle, a small mast and sail (never used), a few spare parts (never used), a Navy bed roll, a suit of shore-going clothes, and the full Navy complement of underwear, toilet articles, etc. 
Not much equipment, was it?   But it was all I needed.  More would have been in the way. Incidentally, the two cheap compasses worked perfectly, and, to my way of thinking, stood the pounding and bouncing much better than one might imagine that they could.

The need for compasses is self-evident.  The barometer was equally necessary, for by regular
reference to that, particularly in the Great Lakes region where I was not acquainted with the
fresh water weather whims, I was able several times to find cover in advance of sharp squalls
which sprang up unannounced, except by the barometer.  I could have ridden them out all
right, but seven years of U.S. Navy experience taught me never to hunt trouble with the weather.

The above equipment, with the exception of spare clothing, is in my boat all of the time so
that preparing for a 2,000-mile trip never takes more than ten minutes.

As I stated, I wanted to start about August first, but with a perversity usual in such cases,
business suddenly picked up the latter half of July and seemed bent on keeping me at home. I stood it as best I could until August third.  That day was very busy, but about 4:30 in the afternoon, things let up a little.  There were no appointments for tomorrow.  So I closed my desk, turned the place over to my assistant, and left.

I took on ten gallons of gas, and at 5:05 P.M. I was leaving Atlantic City.  As I was leaving my dock, my assistant dashed down to the dock, waving what looked like a telegram, and shouting.  With a hurried admonition to him to handle whatever it was himself, I resolutely closed my ears and turned my back. The cruise was on.

I didn’t get far the first night. Shortly after 6:30 after having made about 35 miles, I noted a mean-looking thunder squall making up in the northwest.  Open salt water is no place to be in a thunder storm, so I turned into Barnegat Harbor and stopped for the night.  It was well
I did for the squall turned out to be a hard storm of wind and rain.


I left Barnegat early the next day and cruised up the bay.  I got as far as Manasquan Inlet at
11:00 but the ocean was too rough so I put up at Brielle, New Jersey, for the rest of the day.

August fifth I left Brielle at 7:34 A.M. The sea was heavy and rolling, but seemed to be calming down. Even now I couldn’t avoid business entirely, for about 10:00 A.M.  I was hailed by the fishing boat Mi-Lad which was unable to run on account of ignition difficulties. I sold them a battery for auxiliary ignition. 

At 11:00 A.M. I arrived at the Battery, in New York, then went on up the Hudson.  I passed liners of all nations and sizes, many of them preparing to catch the noon tide and leave for the various parts of the world. I would liked to have run close and taken pictures but I was on my way with a good start. That evening saw me arriving in Poughkeepsie after a rather rough but uneventful trip.

About noon the next day I left Poughkeepsie.  The morning was somewhat foggy and anyhow I was in no hurry. I wanted clear weather to run the bars and snags of the Hudson. I made fair time going up and finally tied up for the night at the Albany Yacht Club. 


August seventh. Lazy again. Met some friends so it was afternoon before I left. I made up for it, however, by traveling until dark, when I tied up at Amsterdam for the night.

A drizzling rain greeted me the next morning, and as this was a pleasure trip and I dislike traveling in rain, I delayed shoving off until 11:30 A.M. when it cleared. Now began one of the prettiest portions of the trip. High, green hills all around, millions of varicolored wild flowers, picturesque homesteads—truly a beautiful country.

About noon I waved to a New York Central freight train. The flagman’s hand waved 10-20-30,  
meaning I was doing 30 m.p.h.
Good traveling, but easy in the smooth canal.

At Lock No. 21 I was locked through with a large tanker loaded with molasses, and here
incidentally, my cruise came close to ending. I was laid up alongside the tanker and the
lock started to fill. I suddenly noticed the great side of the larger ship moving toward me.
A loose forward mooring line was the cause as I later found.
I shouted but the din of machinery and rushing water 
drowned me out. I didn’t have time to paddle out, and anyhow the paddle was inside my little cabin. Fortunately, I had left the starting rope coiled around the flywheel. I gave it a hard yank.  The motor caught and I chugged out of the way.  Not any too soon, either, for sidewise progress of the tanker wasn’t halted until it was within a couple of feet of the lock wall.   I wouldn't have been hurt, but my boat would have been crushed. After that when going through locks with larger boats, I stayed under either the bow or stern.



Towards evening I docked at Svlvan Beach on Lake Oneida and prepared for an early start.
My bed was soft and hard to leave next morning so it was after eight August ninth before I started across Lake Oneida. This is a beautiful body of water, 20 miles long by about 5 miles wide. The land surrounding the lake is rugged in character and adds much to the attractiveness of the lake.

Forty-five minutes sufficed for the run across Oneida. About midway through the lake, I passed thousands of dead whitefish. I couldn’t ascertain the cause of this, but some people in Brewerton at the west end of the lake, told me that this occurred every few years.

The canal from Brewerton to Phoenix must be a campers’ paradise for I passed hundreds of them here. I don’t blame them, they've got high ground, beautiful scenery, good water—in fact, about everything a camp should have.

This day I also stopped at Phoenix and went through a paper mill with E. O. Krom.  I had  never seen paper made before, and it was tremendously interesting. The barge canal has a great many small manufacturing plants along it that would be well worth the traveler's time to investigate.  

Finally, I reached Oswego on Lake Ontario. Not a bad day’s run—considering the many locks and dams I had to pass.  In fact, I found myself well satisfied with progress made. In five days of  leisurely travel I had come from Atlantic City clear across New York through dozens of locks, and still I hadn't hurried but had staved in unless the weather was good. This was a pleasure trip, not a speed contest.

The next day, Thursday, brought a stiff southeast wind.  I ventured out twice but found the lake too rough for comfortable traveling so I stayed in Oswego. 


Friday brought an increasing wind but upon being told by a local prophet that this wind was apt to hold for three or four days longer, I decided to push on. Early in the afternoon I left with the wind still freshening a bit from the southeast. I laid a somewhat roundabout course, heading north for the first three hours, then west. It was very bumpy and of course I did not attempt to travel full throttle but was content to keep the boat just in a planing position. 

By evening I arrived at Lock No. 1, Trenton, Ontario, having traveled the last hour at reduced speed in a gathering storm.   I wished at the time that I had made the trip on the previous day.  I saw very few small craft of any kind. Most of the sailing craft lay inside, figuring it was too rough.  When I arrived at Trenton I had just about a pint of gas left. That was figuring too close for comfort.

The morning of August twelfth was spent passing customs and getting a permit to enter Canada and the Trent Canal, and cleaning up my boat and motor. By noon everything was set and sharply at 12:00 I pulled out. Passed through I don’t know how many locks but it seemed like hundreds. I finally arrived at Hastings, an old vacation town, at dusk. This is a typical resort town, almost deserted  
in winter, they told me, but quite lively with resorters in summer.

August 13, 14, 15 and 16, passed in running the Trent Canal with its many lakes. At the time thought, ‘Here is surely the boater's paradise!” Rough wooded hills, rocky hills, deep canyons, waterfalls, large and small, high and low, numerous lakes of all sizes studded with hundreds of beautiful green, little islands—all making scenery that will compare with the best found anywhere.  I took my time stopping whenever the spirit moved me, exploring
now and then, in short, thoroughly enjoying myself. As a matter of fact, I forgot to eat for a time.


1919 photo of Bobcaygeon, Ontario

August fifteenth I had a good breakfast in Bobcaygeon, a beauti
ful little resort town and headed for another day of the beauties of the Trent. So I cruised all day and finally tied up at Cambridge. 

So contented was I with what I had seen that I felt supper wasn't worthwhile so I turned in and slept in the boat that night. The next morning I woke at 5:00 A.M. and not wanting to wait until the town folks got up, and being anxious to get into Lake Simcoe, which I was told was more beautiful than the rest, I decided to let breakfast go until noon. 




And right here something happened which, having been a sailor in Uncle Sam's Navy, I am reluctant to admit.  In shifting the box containing my $1.10 worth of compasses, I unwittingly or half-wittedly placed it right over my tool box. 

So I set my course for Orillia and started. By and by I arrived in Barrie just about 40 miles from where I should be. Cursing, the Canadian charts, none of which were very accurate or complete, I checked up again and finally when I was about to declare an international plot in crooked charts, I moved my compass box and lo! the needles shifted around to their proper position. So I turned around, put on speed and finally arrived at Port Severn about noon.
There I had lunch at the boarding house of the Hydro Electric Company. That first meal in 30 hours tasted good. But I'd go without meals any time rather than miss the scenery I saw. 

I found this photo of the boarding house in this article at http://parkscanadahistory.com/series/ha/40.pdfat 


I arrived at Midland, Ontario on an arm of  Georgian Bay at five in rather a hurry. The barometer had been dropping steadily all afternoon and the hazy sky and fitful winds gave ample evidence of a heavy storm in the offing.  I found adequate shelter for my boat and it 1s well I did, for that night began a heavy northwest blow that kept me in Midland all of August seventeenth and eighteenth. This storm did over half a million dollars’ damage in that section of Ontario alone, according to the papers. 

The nineteenth saw the weather clear and the barometer rising so at 9 o'clock I laid a northeast course and started up Georgian Bay.  RIGHT here I want to recommend that you do not attempt to buy charts of Canadian waters in any of the smaller Canadian towns.
Such charts as I could get were old and the ones I bought in Midland were dated 1908. They were very incomplete. Get them in Toronto or some other large place.

On the other hand, the small towns can't be blamed too much for Georgian Bay has fallen 8 feet in the last ten years and many charts up to date in 1920 are useless now. 


I soon found out how incomplete the charts were.  About 11 o'clock I landed on a good sized
island and nary a trace of it could I find on the chart.  The mainland shoreline zigged where the chart said 1t should zag, so all in all I was puzzled.  That's where a man who hasn’t done much navigating is better off than the fellow who travels by chart and compass.  The greenhorn will barge ahead in the general direction and nine times out of ten will come out O.K.   The navigator is afraid of the tenth time, however, and stays put until 
forced out or shown the way.

I hailed a couple of passing boats but they were no better off than I. So I settled down to wait until someone who knew the channels came along.  Fortunately, this turned out to be only an hour.  The cruiser Clivea, of Toronto, came along and graciously gave me permission to follow them.  Also they handed me two of the nicest sandwiches I have ever eaten.

We arrived at Parry Sound soon after 2 and there I found an easy solution for future navigation troubles—an Indian guide. I picked up Dave Parwis, an Ojibway Indian and in exchange for his guidance, carried him to Ojibway.  That run takes the local steamer five hours. We made it in an hour and forty minutes.  Dave said it was the fastest boat ride he ever had.

From Ojibway to Pointe au Baril is miles of water and rocks—mostly rocks. I made it in eight minutes with a Mr. F. Massier as guide.  I camped for the night at the Bellevere Hotel, well satisfied with the day's run of 100 miles through rocks and water.



(I believe the article should say the Bellevue Hotel in Pointe au Baril.)


The following morning, Sunday, I tried to pick up a guide who could show me the way to False De Tour Channel and Drummond Island.  No luck.  So I shoved off, headed along the coast, and after getting well lost and finding rocks when the chart said water should be there and vice versa, I finally followed the advice of two men in a passing canoe and put back to Point au Baril to start over again next day.


Monday morning I left Point au Baril quite early and headed out into the bay and deep water.  I much preferred to stay in close to shore for the barometer had been jumpy for a couple of days and seemed to promise heavy weather rather than otherwise.  However, I didn't want to pile up on some rock just under the surface so I struck into the bay.

This was a trying and at the same time an inspiring day. I ran from Pont au Baril to Drummond Island, Michigan, through the grandest cruising country in the world. For elemental grandeur nothing excels it.  There are great ridges of bare granite that still show the deep scars which 
the great glacier put there just before the dawn of written history. 
Other islands of gravel placed by the same glacier are as beautifully covered with green pine as you could wish. A cruise in Georgian Bay will pay you dividends for life. 

That night was cold and as there was no human habitation in sight I stayed in the boat again.  I brought out my can of Sterno and put it to work.  I heated some beans, corn beef and tea and had a simple though hearty meal.  The Sterno also warmed my cabin nicely.



Continuing I picked up gas at Bruce's Point on Drummond Island and headed for De Tour, Michigan, arriving there by noon.  Here was one time when I was glad of the barometer.
Shortly after noon the barometer dropped quite rapidly for an hour and a half. Meantime the lake got very glassy.  I hunted shelter and sure enough, in three-quarters of an hour we were having as nice a squall as I've seen.  It wasn’t a large one but the wind was hard enough to blow spray off the water which is no weather for me to run in.  That cleared up soon, however, and I finally docked at St. Ignace for the night.

On Wednesday I was able to get an excellent chart of Lake Michigan at St. Ignace. Now I could travel.  Left St. Ignace at eleven and made an easy run to Cape Seul Choix, a little way out of Manistique.  There I spoke to the fishing boat Harriet J, owned and piloted by John Goudreau of Naubinway.  He invited me on board and Mr. Goudreau, his partner, and I had a regular sailor's dinner.  Mr. Goudreau kindly put me up for the night in one of his cottages.

Sunday the 27th, I got under way at 8:10 A.M. and ran from to Sister Bay. Right after the start, my barometer again fell and at noon when I was nearing Sister Bay, a hard southeaster blew up in half an hour. In traveling the remaining four miles, I took the worst beating of the whole trip. But boat and motor were good for it and we made port O. K.


The following day I started early in the face of a steady blow, but I was tired of being held by wind. Thirty minutes was enough, after I was soaked to the skin by the water which the freshening wind was lifting off the waves. I sighted a good harbor and made shore. I put in the rest of the day washing clothes Navy style, which means soap, rub, and heat. My 20 cent Sterno stove came in handy again that night.

Tuesday the 29th the water was still rough, but the wind had shifted to northwest and the swells were big and deep but long. I rode into Sturgeon Bay without trouble.  



The next day I left Sturgeon Bay at 9:10 A.M.  The water was still rough and worse yet, the
barometer had dropped from 29.50 to 29.20.  The wind had switched to southeast, which 1s the poorest possible quarter for this part of Lake Michigan.  Earlier in the trip a day like this would have kept me in, but I was now behind schedule and I had to go on.  I arrived at Sheboygan at  1:15 P.M. after a rough trip.  The Coast Guard station told me the wind was holding between 25 and 30 m.p.h. Boat and motor stood 1t well but I didn’t like the idea of facing the 55-mile trip to Milwaukee in water like that.  So I laid over again.

AUGUST 31st I shoved off for Milwaukee at 7:10 A. M.  The wind was just a point off shore but the lake was still very rough.  Even so, I docked at the Milwaukee Yacht Club at 10:00 A. M.  There a fine reception and luncheon was tendered me by the members and a safe and convenient anchorage for my boat was provided.  

.

The Outboard Motors Corporation factory kindly checked over my engine for me.  I knew they would find nothing seriously wrong as the motor seemed to be picking up power and speed all the way along,  but I was surprised to find that outside of straightening out a few nicks in the propeller not a single item of any kind needed replacement after 1,800 miles of hard running. 
That is an eloquent testimonial of the modern outboard.  Most large marine engines couldn't show such a record.  Bear in mind too,  that for almost all of the distance, the motor was turning between 3500 and 4000 R.P.M

 

Erie, Pennsylvania, thence back through Lake Erie and the Erie Barge Canal joining my old route at Lake Oneida in New York.  I spent the next ten days seeing the Fair, and a wonderful ten days it was. 

I didn’t miss a thing that was free, and very little that cost an admission fee, but I must admit my Scotch blood rebelled mightily at having to pay for some of the things.  The free exhibits were 95 per cent of the Fair.








SEPTEMBER 13th bright and early, I lit out down the Chicago River bound for the Illinois. This cruise came to an abrupt end.  For at the first lock I found that I could not go through alone but would have to wait for a boat large enough to warrant operating the lock, yet small enough to permit my entering with it.  On inquiring I found that in all probability, I couldn’t reach the Mississippi inside of ten days.  I couldn’t afford this amount of time,  so I wheeled about, sped back to Chicago, put my boat and motor on a freight car, and took the train for Atlantic City. Thus the cruise ended quickly and finally.

What a wonderful six-weeks’ trip that was! It had all of the elements that a good vacation should possess. First, I was doing something that I loved to do.  Then I was learning something, seeing new faces, new country, meeting new conditions;  the scenery was beautiful, I was active under the most healthful possible surroundings all day long and unlike most vacationers, I lost no sleep but rested long and well each night; I had a definite end in view, a well-formed plan which many vacations lack—in short, instead of tearing down my energy reserves, this vacation trip of mine built them up and put me in shape for about anything that might happen.

Experience on this trip taught me a few valuable things which might be of some use to others who at some time or other might make a similar trip.  Some of us eat too much.  This is particularly true of those who travel by boat.  The fresh, clean air grinds one’s appetite
to a keen edge.  But there isn’t enough exercise to utilize all of the food.  I started out eating three meals a day, but after a few days I cut this down to two—namely, breakfast and
dinner at night.  I felt better and also escaped the delay which would ordinarily occur if one made a regular scheduled stop for a noon meal.  I attempted to carry only emergency rations, very much preferring to go ashore and buy a good breakfast and dinner at some good hotel or, in the smaller towns, at some well-recommended boarding house.  A man on a cruise won't take time to cook properly and won't cook the right things.  I found that you can always rely on the recommendation of some local person as to the best local boarding house.

I spent only three or four nights in my boat.  The rest of the time I slept ashore.  I found that I could obtain high grade lodgings in private homes catering to occasional tourists, for from 50 cents to $1.00 a day—in many cases with breakfast thrown in.  I was equipped to sleep in the boat, but I like to rest in a good bed and in view of the reasonableness with which accommodations can be secured, I would recommend that anyone choose a lodging house and the extra comfort that goes with it rather than the necessarily close quarters of a small boat like mine.

A night spent ashore leaves you fairly itching to get back on the water again. I choose lodging houses for two reasons—one being that I could get accommodations which were in many cases better than those afforded by hotels, at less than hotel prices, and then again, I did not care to dress up each night in order to register in a hotel and felt uncomfortable about going among other people who are all dressed up and who might look askance at a boatman’s working clothes.  Private homes always accept you for what you are and not
what you look like.

Earlier I mentioned that my boat was a step-plane. As the boat was closely examined at almost every stop of the trip, I was surprised to note that every time an experienced boat
man ascertained that I was really using a step boat, his comment would invariably be, “How do you get away with a step-plane?  I always thought step-planes were unseaworthy and
hard riding in any kind of rough water.”  Be that as it may, the bottom of my step boat leaked not at all at the end of 1,800 miles of rough and smooth going.  Not a brace, cross member
or knee had been loosened or even as much as cracked.  I had been in very rough water several times and not once did the boat's actions lead me to believe that we were even close to capsizing or swamping.  I have never seen a conventional Vee bottom outboard boat whose bottom would have stood the pounding as well as my step-bottom. There may be more seaworthy boats than the one that I have, but they will necessarily be slow, and the Pelican design which I followed faithfully, combines speed with safety in exactly the right balance.

Here is another reason why I like the step-plane: Once the boat gets on top of the water in a planing position, you can throttle your motor down to cruising speed and the motor does
not have to labor to run at this speed.  This is economical of fuel as well as of the motor itself.  With a Vee bottom boat, for instance, the motor has to work much harder all of the
time, for while a Vee bottom boat will plane, considerably more energy is required to keep it planing.

I want to confirm what a good many other salt water sailors have discovered, namely, that the Great Lakes and particularly Lake Michigan, can get just as rough as the Atlantic Ocean
at any time.  The swells are not as high as on the ocean, but they are much shorter and break quicker.  Blows that kept me off Lake Michigan would not have stopped me on salt water
because of the longer, more even swells.  Salt water sailors won't believe this, of course; I didn’t myself until I tried it;  but you will find out if you ever try it.

Exclusive of my expenses at the Fair and also carfare home, I spent approximately $125 on the trip.  This included all supplies, spare parts that I did not use, mementos and souvenirs
that I bought at various places and shipped home as I went along.  I could have travelled much more cheaply than this, but I regarded this as inexpensive enough.

On the trip I used a total of 129 gallons of fuel, two tubes of gear grease, six spark plugs, one Columbia Hot Shot battery 
and about 15 shear pins.  This gave me an average of about 14
miles per gallon of gas for the trip.  Such mileage 1s possible only with a step-plane as propeller efficiency is quite high on this type of boat.

Although I carried four or five gallon cans of gas in my boat I did not have all of them filled at one time more than twice on the voyage.  I carried just as little gas as I could on a run, for it was my constant effort to keep the boat loaded as lightly as possible and extra unneeded gas only slackens your speed that much.

So that was my vacation for this year.  It was the best one I have had thus far.  The best proof that it was highly worthwhile to me lies in the fact that I have already planned a similar trip for next year.  Why don’t you plan one, too?








Wednesday, July 6, 2022

1925 Article on History of the Outboard Motor by Finnish Outboard Designer and Metalurgist Gillis E. Huss - Part Two

This is Part 2 of the article started previously in Mootori.  Huss continues his comparison of Evinrude and Archimedes outboards.


However, the Evinrude engine, as well constructed as it was in many respects, was comparatively inferior in detail. The counterweight, which balances the parts moving back and forth, and which should have been located opposite them, i.e. in the knees of the crankshaft on the opposite side of the crank pin, was also adapted to the flywheel.

Because the latter was located very far away due to the long bearing structure, it naturally created unnecessarily strong vibrations when the engine was running, which in a thin and light boat often caused such an echo that the boat began to shake violently. I dare not suppose ignorance to have been the cause of this unfavorable design.  Guessing — here, as in many other cases, the right design had to give way to the cheaper one.

 






Most of Evinrude's followers scrupulously copied the counterweight in the flywheel, and the few who had realized the fallacy of this design never went to great lengths to try to achieve such a perfect balancing that the engine speed had been made to rise even a little bit higher.

 (The "Arcko" engine, with its well-weighted counterweights forged together with the crankshaft, is probably the only exception. Using a special carburetor, the speed of this engine has been raised to over 3,000 revolutions per minute, more difficult = no vibrations.)   [2022 Note:  Could "Arcko" been a typo, and was meant to be "Avecko" - the motor that Huss designed?]

However, it is impossible to achieve perfect balancing in single-cylinder engines without using additional machinery. Theoretically speaking, in order to build a perfectly balanced engine, it is still not necessary to carry out the division into several cylinders. The kind of two-cylinder model that the French call »moteur eguilibre» fulfills the intended ideal, albeit with this engine, at least in the original design, is an unnecessarily complicated piece of machinery.  In the two-cylinder engine last mentioned and shown in outline in Fig. 4, the reciprocating masses balance each other perfectly.

In reality, absolute balancing cannot be achieved, because some disproportionality always remains, no matter how carefully the machine's cylinder is built.

Creating a high-speed, vibration-free engine was the goal of the builder of the "Archimedes engine", when he chose an engine whose cylinders are evenly opposed and pistons move in opposite directions. 

The relatively complex shaft belonging to the motor shown in Figure 4 has been abandoned here, sacrificing a bit of the possibility of balancing, and it has been replaced by the two-knee shaft according to Figure 5. This shows the old fashioned Archimedes engine, cut in half.



Between the oldest models of the Archimedes engines and the Evinrude engine, there was hardly any more essential difference as far as the rest of the machinery is concerned, but over time a whole series of interesting and appropriate structures have given this a design aimed at perfection for the engine. I would like to mention a few of the most significant details of this development.

Archimedes was probably the first outboard motor that was freed from battery ignition hindered by various shortcomings and equipped with a high-voltage magneto. This device was fitted to a stand that could be moved around the axis, so that the setting of the ignition could be done by moving the magnet along with the stand. With this design of the mag a strong spark was still obtained from the net device, when the device was rotated to a position corresponding to both late ignition (when starting) and early ignition (as is well known, this is not the case with ``Bosch'' magnetic devices operating with a standard ignition layout).

After the war, no magnetic device could be obtained from Germany, which caused A-B Archimedes started his own manufacture of these instruments. The form then chosen was what is now called a flywheel magneto (because the steel magnet of the magnetic device is attached to the flywheel of the engine), and it may be interesting to hear in this connection that the Archimedes flywheel magneto actually gave rise to the excellent flywheel magneto which manufactured by the world-famous company name Robert Bosch, in Stuttgart.



A weakness that was common both to the old-style Archimedes engine and to most other outboard engines, but which has been corrected in the newer models of this engine, deserves to be mentioned.

 
The cooling water pump placed in the gearbox, kept running by the eccentric, started to leak regularly after being in practice for a long time, due to wear of the piston. The water was then able to penetrate past the worn piston into the gearbox housing, causing the lubrication of both the heavily loaded gear and especially the bearings of the propeller shaft and drive shaft to deteriorate. But if that's not enough, the water penetrated upwards into the pipe surrounding the drive shaft as well. The pipe had to be equipped with holes so that the water could escape when it penetrated upwards, because otherwise it could have penetrated into the engine's crankcase and interrupted the engine's operation.

For this reason, the cooling water pump models in newer models are placed outside the gearbox, as shown in Figure 6. The eccentric that uses the pump is surrounded by a pockenholz ring, which, as is known, needs no other lubrication than water, in which it moves all the time.



 Some models of the »Archimedes» engine are equipped with a convenient take-back device and a device that automatically sets the rudder arm in a position corresponding to the straight travel direction.

The Archimedes engine, which was based on the Swedish engineers O.W. Hult and C. A. Hult patent, and manufactured by Aktiebolaget Archimedes, Stockholm, was put on the market relatively soon after the Evinrude engine began to gain popularity in Europe. With its many excellent features, the Archimedes motor soon conquered the market all over the world, soon becoming the leading brand in the world market.


In addition to the determined work of the factory's leading technicians, this has probably been influenced by the precise selection of materials, the quality of the company's available machines and tools and, last but not least, the precise work of the factory's convenient and skillfully trained workforce.


Monday, July 4, 2022

1925 Article on History of the Outboard Motor by Finnish Outboard Designer and Metalurgist Gillis E. Huss

This is only the first part of the article as it appeared in the June issue of Moottori.  I will post the second part  from the July issue when I get it done.  

Just a little background - I was researching Gillis Emanuel Huss because he designed the Aveko outboard, the first totally Finnish outboard offered for sale.  The Aveko will be added to Jack Craib''s Rowboat Motor Information Site when I am done.

Outboard Motors

Their structure and development

A Critical Review, by Gillis Em. Huss



Outboard motors belong to a type of boat motor that has at one time achieved a considerable expansion all over the world. The explanation for this circulation probably lies for the most part in the fact that the mentioned motor always forms a completely ready-to-use combined transport and steering system, which anyone can attach to any kind of rowing boat in a few minutes, thus turning the latter into an easy-to-maintain and somehow fast motorboat.


After being mainly a "summer motor" for city dwellers in the early days of its market appearance, and even after that for some years, the outboard motor has conquered many industries with its well-deserved reputation as a machine that runs reliably and is easy to maintain. It is often used, for example, in pilot boats, in tourist traffic on routes where relatively expensive motorboats cannot be used, in small barges belonging to the fleets of numerous countries, for ocean survey purposes, as an aid to scientific expeditions, and very widely as a means of transport on short trips.

 

Among other things, the outboard motor also has the great advantage that it does not take up usable space in the boat. This fact is especially important when small boats are in question. In such boats, the usual boat engine really usurps space for itself, unpleasantly, at the expense of the enjoyment of those on the boat .

 Of the nuisances caused by oil splashes and old, spilled oil and grease on the bottom of the boat in most small motorboats, there is not the slightest trace in a boat equipped with an outboard motor, of whatever design is in practice today. After all, the machine as a whole as well as the fuel tank are then completely outside the side of the boat.


The history of outboard motors goes back a long way, probably about a decade back., — The first model, which was built by a French, German and American factory, was a standard two-stroke engine in a vertical position. On the extension of the engine's crankshaft, there was a somewhat long propeller shaft moving inside the tube sleeve. A «fish iron« was attached to the socket, just in front of the propeller, as well as a protective device surrounding the propeller. The rudder arm, which supported the small fuel tank, protruded from the crankcase as an extension of the crankshaft, directly opposite the propeller shaft. 

The design can be seen in picture 1.


The device was attached to the stern of the boat with a strap, on which the rest of the device was rotatably mounted. Somehow, the long propeller shaft stuck out from the stern of the boat roughly like a stern paddle, and based on this, this outboard motor was very commonly called a «motor rudder».


The model is remarkable indeed, naturally quite improved, it has retained its place in the American market. We don't use this design as the engine has no future, mainly because it takes up a lot of space at the stern of the boat and because the length of the engine limits the maneuverability of the boat. 


A notable step forward in development was the «Porto» engine, built and manufactured by the Waterman Marine Co. factory located in Detroit, which is shown in figure 2. 



The engine here is the same as in the previously mentioned model model, upright two-stroke engine. At one end of its crankshaft is a wedge-shaped pinion gear, which drives corresponding wheels attached to the combined drive and starting shaft. To transfer the driving force from the vertical drive shaft to the horizontal propeller shaft, a bevel gear is used, which is completely left un-encased (at least in the first engines). The cooling water pump is operated by an eccentric fitted to the extension of the propeller shaft. — 

The »Porto« engine has a cylinder diameter of 70 m/m and a stroke of 76 m/m.


The credit for inventing the basic form of outboard motors, which is mainly represented by most products today, undoubtedly goes to the Norwegian-American Ole Evinrude, who has sometimes been called the father of the outboard motor, sometimes exaggerated a bit.


The design of the Evinrude, viewed against the background of the above-explained engines, contains a whole host of remarkable details, and when this engine, with its beautiful and practical construction, was put on the market, it quickly became very popular, and with good reason. 

The structure of the motor can be seen in figure 3.


The most significant detail of the Evinrude engine was the fact that the engine itself was placed in a horizontal position with vertical crankshafts. The drive shaft is immediately connected to the crankshaft with a long conveyor sleeve, where the drive shaft can be pushed. As a result of these constructions, it was possible to avoid using the necessary drive shaft gear in the Waterman engine. 


Starting can be conveniently done using a handle fitted to the engine's horizontal flywheel. The gear housing, which beautifully matches the shape of the propeller hub, forms a closed chamber filled with lubricant around the bevel gear, which transfers the movement from the drive shaft to the propeller shaft. The cooling water pump, which is built inside the gear housing, gets its movement from the cam formed in the gear wheel of the propeller shaft. 


Among other notable details of this engine, it should be mentioned that the sleeve device surrounding the drive shaft is telescopically protruding, so the sleeve can be extended or shortened as desired. The mounting bracket is designed in such a way that the motor can easily be placed in a position corresponding to the slope of the stern.


The diameter and stroke of the cylinder are both 64 mm.

From the above brief explanation, we can see that the Evinrude engine, when it appeared on the market already fourteen years ago, came from the hand of a fairly independent and clear-minded builder. - (to be continued)